Lawyer refuses to pay for daughter's hearing aid; buys $215,000 engagement ring
According to The New York Post, Ira Schacter, 51, who works for the law firm of Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, is involved in a bitter divorce battle with his estranged wife, Janice, 48. He apparently spent $215,00 (yes, you read that right!) on an engagement ring for his Playboy bunny fiancee. However, he refuses to cough up money to pay for his daughter's hearing aid, which costs $12,000.
The soon to be ex-wife, Janice, states that while Schacter was lavishing his fiancée, Lace Rose Allenius, 26, with bling, he ignored a 2010 court order that gives Janice Schacter "legal decision-making" for the "physical auditory care to the extent provided by a doctor, audiologist or hearing-aids provider."
However, Schacter's lawyer states that according to a Manhattan Supreme Court Judge, Laura E. Drager, he is not responsible for expenses unless he gives prior approval.
Well, there are two sides to every story. A close review the prior order regarding Schacter's responsibility for payment of his daughter's hearing aids is necessary. If the order states that he needs to give his prior approval, then Janice should not be able to unilaterally buy and charge said expense for the hearing aid. However, if the order gives Janice unfettered discretion to make legal decisions on behalf of the daughter and purchase her medical necessities, then perhaps Schacter is obligated to pay for said expense. We would need to closely review the order currently in place.
From an Orange County divorce lawyer's perspective, this case stresses the importance of carefully reading and reviewing your court order before taking any action (or inaction).
If you have a divorce issue in Orange County or Los Angeles County, contact an Orange County divorce lawyer for more information.
Source: Lawyer refuses to pay for daughter's hearing aids but bought fiancee diamond ring
