December 2011 Archives

International Custody Battle reunites daughter with father

December 30, 2011, by Winiviere G. Sy

This past Friday, a Milwaukee father was reunited with his daughter, whose mother abducted her to Japan shortly after the father filed for divorce back in 2008.

The father, Moises Garcia, met his daughter at O'Hare International Airport, where she arrived with her grandmother and Garcia's Japanese lawyer. Along with Sakar, there were several law enforcement officials, staff of the Japanese Consulate in Chicago, a psychologist, representatives of the U.S. State Department and advocates for other American parents whose children are being held in Japan, where officials have refused to sign a world convention about international child abduction.

The girl's return also freed her mother from jail in Milwaukee, where she had been held on contempt charges due to her interference with a prior child custody order. The mother was arrested on a Wisconsin warrant in Hawaii, where she had gone to renew her U.S. permanent resident status.

Garcia's ex-wife, Emiko Inoue, 43, is Japanese with legal U.S. residency while married to Garcia, a physician. She took her daughter to Japan in February 2008, shortly after Garcia had filed for divorce, and ignored court orders to return. Last month, Inoue pleaded no contest to interfering with child custody under an agreement that she would ultimately be convicted of a misdemeanor if her daughter was returned to Garcia, who has legal custody.

From an Orange County divorce lawyer's perspective, such child custody battles can be very traumatic and expensive. The father in this case had not seen his daugther since 2008 and miraculously, she was released back to her father after many years of court battle.

This case is also sets an example of what happens to parents who do not comply with court orders. The court can hold the person in contempt and throw them in jail or pay a fine.

For more information on any child custody or visitation issues you may have, contact an Orange County divorce lawyer for more information.

Source: Daughter in custody rift returns from Japan

Debra Messing and Husband Separate

December 29, 2011, by Winiviere G. Sy

Debra Messing and her husband, Daniel Zelman, have separated after approximately over 10 years of marriage. The couple allegedly split earlier this year and wed back on September 3, 2000. The couple have one son, Roman, age 7. Although the couple have announced their separation, they are still living in the same residence and have no immediate plans to divorce.

"In the short term, they plan on continuing to live together with their son, then gradually transition into a new living situation," a rep for both Messing and Zelman tells US Weekly.

From an Orange County divorce lawyer's perspective, if the parties decide to divorce, there will be issues relating to spousal support, child support, child custody and visitation issues.

If the marriage last over 10 years, it is a marriage of long duration and the recipient spouse would be entitled to spousal support for more than half of the length of the marriage. Additionally, the parties will have to work out a child custody and child visitation plan along with payment of child support. Generally speaking, child support is based on timeshare each party has with the child and each party's gross monthly income.

Lastly, even though the couple is still living together, it does not mean that they have "not separated". The date of separation for the couple will be based on the date each party thought that the marriage was completely over and there was no possibility of reconciliation.

For more information on filing a divorce action in Los Angeles or Orange County, contact an Orange County divorce lawyer for more information.

Source: Debra Messing and Husband: Separated, Still Living Together, "No Immediate Plans for Divorce."

Sinead O'Connor splits with husband after 18 days of marriage

December 28, 2011, by Winiviere G. Sy

First Kim Kardashian decided to divorce her husband Kris Humphries after 72 days of marriage. Now, Sinead O'Connor is splitting with her husband after 18 days of marriage. This is O'Connor's fourth marriage. O'Connor states on her website the reasonfor the divorce is as follows:

"Dear friends, I had for reasons u will all understand, wished to keep this private but have been told today it is to be leaked in the next few days despite my best efforts. So I must now leak it myself so as the record is straight ... From the moment myself and my husband got together not long ago, there was intense pressure placed upon him by certain people in his life, not to be involved with me. These were people who had never met me but had formed opinions of me based on what they read about 'Sinead 'O'Connor' in the media etc. Entitled as they are to their opinions about me many perhaps well deserved, there was no righteousness on anyone's part to put my husband through what he was put through as a result of his desire to be with me and to marry me and as a result of his actually marrying me."

From an Orange County divorce lawyer's perspective, considering the marriage lasted only 18 days, same is a marriage of short duration. If a party wanted to request spousal support from the other, that person would only be entitled to receipt of same for 9 days (1/2 of the length of the marriage).

At any rate, if you are contemplating filing for divorce in Los Angeles or Orange County, contact an Orange County divorce lawyer for more information.

Source: Sinead O'Connor splitting with husband after 18 days of marriage

Military Divorce Rates at a higher level

December 21, 2011, by Winiviere G. Sy

The military divorce rate reached its highest level since 1999, as nearly 30,000 marriages ended 2011. This raises the presumption that troop withdrawals may lead to more divorce, according to interviews and Pentagon data released last Tuesday.

"As the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan draw down, we're going to put more families together who haven't been used to being together," says Chaplain Carleton Birch, a spokesman for the Army Office of the Chief of Chaplains.

The overall military divorce rate of 3.7% this year edged out the most recent U.S. civilian rate recorded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 2009 of 3.5%, which has been in decline since 2000.

The Army divorce rate of 3.7% and the Navy's 3.6% are the highest for either service since 2004.

The Air Force rate of 3.9% is the highest in more than two decades. Nearly 5% of marriages among Air Force enlisted personnel ended in divorce this year.

Split marriages were most common among enlisted women across the military, with nearly one in 10 marriages within this group ending this year.

The Marine Corps divorce rate of 3.8% remained the same as 2010, Pentagon data shows.

From an Orange County divorce lawyer's perspective, going through a divorce while trying to end a war in another part of the world is definitely tough. This is why hiring an Orange County divorce lawyer to litigate your divorce in either Orange County or Los Angeles County will help with the stress of divorce.

Contact an Orange County divorce lawyer for more information on obtaining a divorce.

Source: Military divorce rate at highest level since 1999

Divorce for Allen Iverson

December 19, 2011, by Winiviere G. Sy

Former Philadelphia 76ers star, Allen Iverson, is going through an ugly divorce fight with his soon to be ex-wife, Tawanna Iverson.

Tawanna Iverson has filed documents in court claiming that Allen Iverson stopped deposting funds into their joint bank account and that he made several large cash withdrawals.

Tawanna Iverson says she is unable to pay the bills or provide for the couple's five children. Allen Iverson contested those statements in court documents.

From an Orange County divorce lawyer's perspective, the couple will have to deeal with issues relating spousal support, child custody, child visitation, child support and property division. I'm sure the Iverson family accumulated a lot of money and wealth throughout the marriage and money will have to be paid to Tawanna.

At any rate, you can save yourself the hassle of going throug the trials and tribulations of a divorce by hiring an experienced and reputable attorney. Contact and Orange County divorce lawyer for more information.

Source: Allen Iverson in Messy Divorce Fight

Mom arrested for trying to sell baby for $7,000

December 16, 2011, by Winiviere G. Sy

In Miami, Florida, Kenia Quiala Bosque, 30, was arrested and charged with trying to sell her 8-month-old son for $7,000, authorities said. Authorities say Bosque had arranged to meet a Monroe County man in Miami on Saturday to exchange the child for the money.

When the Monroe County Sheriff's Office received a tip about the transaction, the FDLE arranged to have an undercover agent be at the baby handoff.

However, after Bosque failed to show up and fearing for the child's well-being, deputies and agents went to her home and had enough evidence to make an arrest, authorities said.

"We are just so glad we were able to obtain this information in time to intervene before anything could happen to endanger this child," Sheriff Bob Peryam said in a statement.

Bosque was booked into Miami-Dade County jail and was being held on $5,000 bond Monday. It was unknown whether she has an attorney.

Bosque's children were placed in the custody of relatives, authorities said.

From an Orange County child custody lawyer's perspective, attempting to sell your child is not a very smart move. Not only are there family law issues involved but you could be criminally charged for doing so.

Contact an Orange County child custody lawyer if you have any issues regarding obtaining legal custody or physical custody.

Source: Mom arrested for trying to sell baby for $7,000

Los Angeles County Divorce for Dan Cortese

December 14, 2011, by Winiviere G. Sy

According to TMZ, Dan Cortese has filed for a Los Angeles County divorce from his wife, Dawn. The parties married back in 1994 and have two minor children together. Further, according to court documents, the couple put their Malibu home on the market back in June of this year.

From an Orange County divorce lawyer's perspective, the parties here will have to deal with issues relating to spousal support, child support, child custody and child visitation.

Considering the parties were married back in 1994 and if their date of separation was sometime this year in 2011, this would be a marriage of long duration, which means the recipient spouse would be entitled to spousal support for more than 1/2 the length of the marriage and that the court would retain jurisdiction over same.

For more information on filing a divorce in Los Angeles County or Orange County, contact an Orange County divorce lawyer for more information.

Source: Dan Cortese Files for Divorce

How to lose chid custody

December 13, 2011, by Winiviere G. Sy

Here is a very helpful article I found online about how to lose custody of your child. The link to the direct article can be found here.

As a matrimonial law attorney who regularly represents mothers and fathers in contested divorce trials, I have very some straight forward advice for parents going through divorce, and who are contemplating a custody action. More than ever, I am counseling mothers on how to not lose custody of their children.

From the outset, it is important for mothers and fathers to recognize that married parents of minor children start out with joint custody rights. This means that both parents have equal rights to their children, and the same right to pursue custody of their children in their divorce case. In a world where many households contain two working parents, and many fathers have an active role in raising their children, the presumption that mothers will automatically get custody no longer exists. In fact, statistics show that fathers who seek primary custody of their children are awarded custody 50% of the time. Custody laws are gender neutral, and this means that when the facts of a given case are applied to the governing law, a court may determine that it is in the best interests of the child to live primarily with the father, not the mother.

Now, here is a list of the seven most common pitfalls of parties going through custody actions. Moms, if you want to lose your custody case, here is the way to do it. If you are a parent and you want to win custody, steer clear of the following:

1. Not being the primary caretaker: In most households, one parent is most responsible for caring for the children's basic needs -- the so called primary caretaker. The parent who is the most involved in the children's daily lives usually has the edge in a custody case. Therefore, if you are not putting in the time to do homework with your child, feeding, bathing, reading, taking him or her to the bus stop, you are at a disadvantage in a custody case. There is no better way to lose custody than to demonstrate to a judge that you are simply not involved in raising your child.

2. Not being active in your child's schedule and activities: Do you know the names of your child's teachers? Have you ever supervised your child on a play date or taken your child to the doctor? Do you regularly attend school conferences and school events? If the answer to these is no, then it is an indication that someone else (i.e. the other parent) is the primary caretaker, not you.

3. Not addressing alcohol, drugs, or other parental fitness issues: A parent who even casually partakes in alcohol and/or drugs will have a problem winning custody. Most judges will take allegations of substance abuse seriously, and these allegations will be investigated thoroughly via random testing, psychological evaluations, and interviews. If you have an issue with substance abuse, then seek treatment for it immediately. If you are the perpetrator of domestic violence or abuse (which often goes hand in hand with alcohol use), this also pretty much guarantees that you will lose custody.

4. Leaving a paper trail that will hang you in court: Thanks to new technology, virtually every custody trial features the submission of evidence that can be used to portray the other parent in a very damaging light. Sometimes the evidence can make or break the custody case. The evidence can include text messages, photos and negative emails. Also potentially harmful are video and voice mail recordings (a la Alec Baldwin). If you are prone to sending impulsive emails and texts, ranting and raving at the other parent, third parties, or your own child, you are at risk of losing custody.

5. Disparaging the other parent. Judges tend to look favorably upon a parent who demonstrates that he/she supports the child's relationship with the other parent. A parent who is constantly denigrating the other parent, leaking anger, and negatively influencing the child's relationship with the noncustodial parent will be reprimanded. In extreme cases, there will allegations of parental alienation and interference with parenting time. Many judges will consider a change of custody if this type of interference is shown. Bottom line: if you want to show the Judge that you will promote the best interests of your child, then you need to show that you recognize the value of the child's relationship with your ex, and will take the steps to encourage that relationship. Of course, when you are going through an adversarial proceeding with someone you don't like very much, it can be very hard to put those feelings aside for the sake of your child. But that is exactly what you need to do if you want to prevail in your case.

6. Showing lack of control: It is critical to consistently act with good judgment and self control if you want to win custody. A parent who regularly loses control, and who cannot control his/her anger will be at a disadvantage. I have handled many cases where a litigant will lose control right in the courtroom, in front of the Judge. An angry outburst in court will be remembered. Similarly, a parent who acts out in front of the child's attorney, social workers, teachers, neighbors, etc. will find himself confronted with a lot of negative testimony and evidence at trial. This is where the voice mails and emails also come into play. If you are serious about winning custody, then you must exhibit self control and put your child's needs first. Going through a divorce is a difficult, emotional process. A custody case raises the stakes considerably. If necessary, seek counseling to get your anger under control. At the very least, taking this step will likely lead to improved relationships with your ex, other third parties, family members, and your child.

7. Failing to follow your attorney's advice: Going through a divorce and/or custody proceeding is one of the most stressful experiences there is. Whether you are seeking primary custody of your children, joint decision making, or a customized parenting plan, your goal should be to survive the process while protecting your rights to your most valuable asset -- your children. It is critical that you seek out the advice of an experienced family law attorney, who has handled contested custody trials (not the attorney who did the closing on your house, or the lawyer who charges the lowest retainer to do an uncontested divorce.) With an experienced advocate by your side, you can avoid making the mistakes outlined above, and you can be successful in your custody case.

Divorce for Sex and the City creator, Candace Bushnell

December 12, 2011, by Winiviere G. Sy

The writer behind the HBO hit, Sex and the City, Candace Bushnell, is divorcing her husband of nine years. In 2002, Bushnell married ballet dancer, Charles Askegard.

A friend told the New York Post: "This has been coming for a long time. They have been living increasingly separate lives. Candace has been spending more and more time in the country at her house in Connecticut, while Charles has been in the city working. He has been going through a huge career transition."

From an Orange County divorce perspective, the parties herein will have to work out issues pertaining to spousal support. Since the parties were married for less than ten years, in California, the recipient of spousal support would be entitled to receive same for one half of the length of the marriage. From reports throughout the web, it is unknown if the parties have any minor children together. If so, they would also have to work out issues pertaining to child custody, child visitation and child support.

At any rate, if you are contemplating filing a Los Angeles County or Orange County divorce, contact a reputable Orange County divorce lawyer for more information.

Source: Sex and the City creator Candace Bushnell files for divorce from ballet dancer husband of nine years

Should Kim Kardashian keep her massive engagement ring?

December 8, 2011, by Winiviere G. Sy

As we all know (whether it was a publicity stunt or not), Kim Kardashian and Kris Humphries are ending their marriage. If you watched "Keeping up with the Kardashians", then you know that Kim was given a giant 20-something karat engagement ring by Kris. Now that the couple is splitting, does Kim have to return her giant engagement ring?

From an Orange County divorce attorney's perspective, the answer is yes and Kim should return it anyway because she broke off the marriage and will no longer be married to Kris. Pursuant to Civil Code Section 1590, it states as follows:

"Where either party to a contemplated marriage in this State makes a gift of money or property to the other on the basis or assumption that the marriage will take place, in the event that the donee refuses to enter into the marriage as contemplated or that it
is given up by mutual consent, the donor may recover such gift or such part of its value as may, under all of the circumstances of the case, be found by a court or jury to be just."

Although the code states "refuses to enter into the marriage", it would seem fair for Kim to return such an expensive ring even though they entered into the marriage and broke it off 72 days later.

Additionally, there are other civil causes of actions that Kris could file in an attempt to get the ring back. For instance, he could allege negligence, fraud (which he is doing through his Response for an annulment), deceit and intentional infliction of emotional distress, just to name a few.

If you are contemplating filing for a divorce in Los Angeles or Orange County, contact an Orange County divorce lawyer for more information.

Skier Lindsey Vonn and husband to divorce

December 7, 2011, by Winiviere G. Sy

Olympic gold-medal-winning skier Lindsey Vonn and her husband, Thomas Vonn, have announced they will be divorcing after four years of marriage.

Lindsey Vonn said she will keep her married name. She was known as Lindsey Kildow before her 2007 marriage.

"This is an extremely difficult time in my personal life and I hope the media and my fans can respect my need for privacy on this matter," she said in a statement.

In addition to being her husband, Thomas Vonn coordinated his wife's interviews and served as a quasi-coach. He said he is ending all input concerning her career.

From an Orange County divorce lawyer's perspective, if the couple were to divorce in the State of California, with respect to spousal support, the recipient spouse would only be eligible to obtain spousal support for one-half of the length of the marriage considering this is a marriage of short duration (less then 10 years).

At any rate, the couple do not have any children so any disputes concerning child custody and child visitation would not be raised.

For more information on filing for divorce in Orange County or Los Angeles County, contact an Orange County divorce lawyer for more information.

Source: Lindsey Vonn, husband to divorce

Orange County child custody: What is the "best interest" of the child?

December 5, 2011, by Winiviere G. Sy

In Orange County, child custody must be awarded according to the child's best interest. It may not be awarded by reference to the parents' interests or to achieve equity between the parents.

Here is an recitation of Family Code section 3011, which outlines the "best interest" standard for Orange County and Los Angeles County child custody and visitation:

"In making a determination of the best interest of the child
in a proceeding described in Section 3021, the court shall, among any
other factors it finds relevant, consider all of the following:
(a) The health, safety, and welfare of the child.
(b) Any history of abuse by one parent or any other person seeking
custody against any of the following:
(1) Any child to whom he or she is related by blood or affinity or
with whom he or she has had a caretaking relationship, no matter how
temporary.
(2) The other parent.
(3) A parent, current spouse, or cohabitant, of the parent or
person seeking custody, or a person with whom the parent or person
seeking custody has a dating or engagement relationship.
As a prerequisite to the consideration of allegations of abuse,
the court may require substantial independent corroboration,
including, but not limited to, written reports by law enforcement
agencies, child protective services or other social welfare agencies,
courts, medical facilities, or other public agencies or private
nonprofit organizations providing services to victims of sexual
assault or domestic violence. As used in this subdivision, "abuse
against a child" means "child abuse" as defined in Section 11165.6 of
the Penal Code and abuse against any of the other persons described
in paragraph (2) or (3) means "abuse" as defined in Section 6203 of
this code.
(c) The nature and amount of contact with both parents, except as
provided in Section 3046.
(d) The habitual or continual illegal use of controlled substances
or habitual or continual abuse of alcohol by either parent. Before
considering these allegations, the court may first require
independent corroboration, including, but not limited to, written
reports from law enforcement agencies, courts, probation departments,
social welfare agencies, medical facilities, rehabilitation
facilities, or other public agencies or nonprofit organizations
providing drug and alcohol abuse services. As used in this
subdivision, "controlled substances" has the same meaning as defined
in the California Uniform Controlled Substances Act, Division 10
(commencing with Section 11000) of the Health and Safety Code.
(e) (1) Where allegations about a parent pursuant to subdivision
(b) or (d) have been brought to the attention of the court in the
current proceeding, and the court makes an order for sole or joint
custody to that parent, the court shall state its reasons in writing
or on the record. In these circumstances, the court shall ensure that
any order regarding custody or visitation is specific as to time,
day, place, and manner of transfer of the child as set forth in
subdivision (b) of Section 6323.
(2) The provisions of this subdivision shall not apply if the
parties stipulate in writing or on the record regarding custody or
visitation."

For more information on filing an Orange County or Los Angeles County child custody action, contact an Orange County child custody lawyer for more information.

Kris Humphries to file for Annulment

December 2, 2011, by Winiviere G. Sy

I previously covered the topic of filing for an Orange County or Los Angeles County annulment here. Now, it has been reported that Kris Humphries is seeking to annul his marriage to reality star, Kim Kardashian. By filing for an annulment, its as if the marriage to Kardashian never occurred.

Pursuant to Family Code section 2210, the following are factors one must satisfy in order to annul a marriage in an Orange County or Los Angeles County court.

"A marriage is voidable and may be adjudged a nullity if any
of the following conditions existed at the time of the marriage:
(a) The party who commences the proceeding or on whose behalf the
proceeding is commenced was without the capability of consenting to
the marriage as provided in Section 301 or 302, unless, after
attaining the age of consent, the party for any time freely cohabited
with the other as husband and wife.
(b) The husband or wife of either party was living and the
marriage with that husband or wife was then in force and that husband
or wife (1) was absent and not known to the party commencing the
proceeding to be living for a period of five successive years
immediately preceding the subsequent marriage for which the judgment
of nullity is sought or (2) was generally reputed or believed by the
party commencing the proceeding to be dead at the time the subsequent
marriage was contracted.
(c) Either party was of unsound mind, unless the party of unsound
mind, after coming to reason, freely cohabited with the other as
husband and wife.
(d) The consent of either party was obtained by fraud, unless the
party whose consent was obtained by fraud afterwards, with full
knowledge of the facts constituting the fraud, freely cohabited with
the other as husband or wife.
(e) The consent of either party was obtained by force, unless the
party whose consent was obtained by force afterwards freely cohabited
with the other as husband or wife.
(f) Either party was, at the time of marriage, physically
incapable of entering into the marriage state, and that incapacity
continues, and appears to be incurable."

In the most common of cases, a party will seek to annul his or her marriage because after marriage, the other spouse refuses to engage in "sexual relations" with the other spouse. Another example would be if a party stated that she wanted to have children and then husband refused after the parites married. It will be interesting to see under what grounds Humphries is seeking an annulment.

To determine if you should seek an annulment of your marriage, contact an Orange County divorce lawyer for more information.

Source: Kris Humphries to file for Separation Not Divorce: Sources